|
Note: Large images and
tables on this page may necessitate printing in landscape mode.
Copyright
© The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
Basic and Clinical Pharmacology > Chapter
30. Antidepressant Agents >
|
Case Study
A 47-year-old woman presents to
her primary care physician with a chief complaint of fatigue. She
indicates that she was promoted to senior manager in her company
approximately 11 months earlier. Although her promotion was welcome and
came with a sizable raise in pay, it resulted in her having to move away
from an office and group of colleagues she very much enjoyed. In
addition, her level of responsibility increased dramatically. The patient
reports that for the last 7 weeks, she has been waking up at 3 AM every night and being unable to go back
to sleep. She dreads the day and the stresses of the workplace. As a
consequence, she is not eating as well as she might and has dropped 7% of
her body weight in the last 3 months. She also reports being so stressed
that she breaks down crying in the office occasionally and has been
calling in sick frequently. When she comes home, she finds she is less
motivated to attend to chores around the house and has no motivation,
interest, or energy to pursue recreational activities that she once
enjoyed such as hiking. She describes herself as "chronically
miserable and worried all the time." Her medical history is notable
for chronic neck pain from a motor vehicle accident for which she is
being treated with tramadol and meperidine. In addition, she is on
hydrochlorothiazide and propranolol for hypertension. The patient has a
history of one depressive episode after a divorce that was treated
successfully with fluoxetine. Medical workup including complete blood
cell count, thyroid function tests, and a chemistry panel reveals no
abnormalities. She is started on fluoxetine for a presumed major
depressive episode and referred for cognitive behavioral psychotherapy.
What CYP450 and pharmacodynamic interactions might be associated with
fluoxetine use in this patient? Which class of antidepressants would be
contraindicated in this patient?
|
|
Antidepressant Agents: Introduction
The diagnosis of depression
still rests primarily on the clinical interview. Major depressive
disorder (MDD) is characterized by depressed mood most of the time for at
least 2 weeks and/or loss of interest or pleasure in most activities. In
addition, depression is characterized by disturbances in sleep and
appetite as well as deficits in cognition and energy. Thoughts of guilt,
worthlessness, and suicide are common. Coronary artery disease, diabetes,
and stroke appear to be more common in depressed patients, and depression
may considerably worsen the prognosis for patients with a variety of
comorbid medical conditions.
According to a 2007 report by
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, antidepressant drugs were
the most commonly prescribed medications in the USA at
the time of the survey. The wisdom of such widespread use of
antidepressants is debated. However, it is clear that American physicians
have been increasingly inclined to use antidepressants to treat a host of
conditions and that patients have been increasingly receptive to their
use.
The primary indication for
antidepressant agents is the treatment of MDD. Major depression, with a
lifetime prevalence of around 17% in the USA and a point prevalence of
5%, is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. MDD
represents one of the most common causes of disability in the developed
world. In addition, major depression is commonly associated with a
variety of medical conditions—from chronic pain to coronary artery
disease. When depression coexists with other medical conditions, the
patient's disease burden increases, and the quality of life—and often the
prognosis for effective treatment—decreases significantly.
Some of the growth in
antidepressant use may be related to the broad application of these
agents for conditions other than major depression. For example,
antidepressants have received FDA approvals for the treatment of panic
disorder, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), post-traumatic stress
disorder (PTSD), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). In addition,
antidepressants are commonly used to treat pain disorders such as
neuropathic pain and the pain associated with fibromyalgia. Some
antidepressants are used for treating premenstrual dysphoric disorder
(PMDD), mitigating the vasomotor symptoms of menopause, and treating
stress urinary incontinence. Thus, antidepressants have a broad spectrum
of use in medical practice. However, their primary use remains the
treatment for MDD.
Pathophysiology of Major
Depression
There has been a marked shift in
the last decade in our understanding of the pathophysiology of major
depression. In addition to the older idea that a deficit in function or
amount of monoamines (the monoamine hypothesis) is central to the
biology of depression, there is evidence that neurotrophic and endocrine
factors play a major role (the neurotrophic hypothesis).
Histologic studies, structural and functional brain imaging research,
genetic findings, and steroid research all suggest a complex
pathophysiology for MDD with important implications for drug treatment.
Neurotrophic Hypothesis
There is substantial evidence
that nerve growth factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor
(BDNF) are critical in the regulation of neural plasticity,
resilience, and neurogenesis. The evidence suggests that depression is
associated with the loss of neurotrophic support and that effective
antidepressant therapies increase neurogenesis and synaptic connectivity
in cortical areas such as the hippocampus. BDNF is thought to exert its
influence on neuronal survival and growth effects by activating the
tyrosine kinase receptor B in both neurons and glia (Figure 30–1).
Several lines of evidence
support the neurotrophic hypothesis. Animal and human studies indicate
that stress and pain are associated with a drop in BDNF levels and that
this loss of neurotrophic support contributes to atrophic structural
changes in the hippocampus and perhaps other areas such as the medial
frontal cortex and anterior cingulate. The hippocampus is known to be
important both in contextual memory and regulation of the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Likewise, the anterior
cingulate plays a role in the integration of emotional stimuli and
attention functions, whereas the medial orbital frontal cortex is also
thought to play a role in memory, learning, and emotion.
Over 30 structural imaging
studies suggest that major depression is associated with a 5–10% loss of
volume in the hippocampus, although some studies have not replicated this
finding. Depression and chronic stress states have also been associated
with a substantial loss of volume in the anterior cingulate and medial
orbital frontal cortex. Loss of volume in structures such as the
hippocampus also appears to increase as a function of the duration of
illness and the amount of time that the depression remains untreated.
Another source of evidence
supporting the neurotrophic hypothesis of depression comes from studies
of the direct effects of BDNF on emotional regulation. Direct infusion of
BDNF into the midbrain, hippocampus, and lateral ventricles of rodents
has an antidepressant-like effect in animal models. Moreover, all known
classes of antidepressants are associated with an increase in BDNF levels
in animal models with chronic (but not acute) administration. This
increase in BDNF levels is consistently associated with increased
neurogenesis in the hippocampus in these animal models. Other
interventions thought to be effective in the treatment of major
depression, including electroconvulsive therapy, also appear to robustly
stimulate BDNF levels and hippocampus neurogenesis in animal models.
Human studies seem to support
the animal data on the role of neurotrophic factors in stress states.
Depression appears to be associated with a drop in BDNF levels in the
cerebrospinal fluid and serum as well as with a decrease in tyrosine
kinase receptor B activity. Conversely, administration of antidepressants
increases BDNF levels in clinical trials and may be associated with an
increase in hippocampus volume in some patients.
Much evidence supports the
neurotrophic hypothesis of depression, but not all evidence is consistent
with this concept. Animal studies in BDNF knockout mice have not always
suggested an increase in depressive or anxious behaviors that would be
expected with a deficiency of BDNF. In addition, some animal studies have
found an increase in BDNF levels after some types of social stress and an
increase rather than a decrease in depressive behaviors with lateral
ventricle injections of BDNF.
A proposed explanation for the
discrepant findings on the role of neurotrophic factors in depression is
that there are polymorphisms for BDNF that may yield very different
effects. Mutations in the BDNF gene have been found to be
associated with altered anxiety and depressive behavior in both animal
and human studies.
Thus, the neurotrophic
hypothesis continues to be intensely investigated and has yielded new
insights and potential targets in the treatment of MDD.
Monoamines and Other
Neurotransmitters
The monoamine hypothesis of
depression (Figure 30–2) suggests that depression is related to a
deficiency in the amount or function of cortical and limbic serotonin
(5-HT), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA).
Evidence to support the
monoamine hypothesis comes from several sources. It has been known for
many years that reserpine treatment, which is known to deplete
monoamines, is associated with depression in a subset of patients.
Similarly, depressed patients who respond to serotonergic antidepressants
such as fluoxetine often rapidly suffer relapse when given diets free of
tryptophan, a precursor of serotonin synthesis. Patients who respond to
noradrenergic antidepressants such as desipramine are less likely to
relapse on a tryptophan-free diet. However, depleting catecholamines in
depressed patients who have previously responded to noradrenergic agents
likewise tends to be associated with relapse. Administration of an inhibitor
of norepinephrine synthesis is also associated with a rapid return of
depressive symptoms in patients who respond to noradrenergic but not
necessarily in patients who had responded to serotonergic
antidepressants.
Another line of evidence
supporting the monoamine hypothesis comes from genetic studies. A
functional polymorphism exists for the promoter region of the serotonin
transporter gene, which regulates how much of the transporter protein is
available. Subjects who are homozygous for the s (short) allele may be
more vulnerable to developing major depression and suicidal behavior in
response to stress. In addition, homozygotes for the s allele may also be
less likely to respond to and tolerate serotonergic antidepressants.
Conversely, subjects with the l (long) allele tend to be more resistant
to stress and may be more likely to respond to serotonergic
antidepressants.
Studies of depressed patients
have sometimes shown an alteration in monoamine function. For example,
some studies have found evidence of alteration in serotonin receptor
numbers (5-HT1A and 5-HT2C) or norepinephrine ( 2)
receptors in depressed and suicidal patients, but these findings have not
been consistent. A reduction in the primary serotonin metabolite
5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in the cerebrospinal fluid is associated with
violent and impulsive behavior, including violent suicide attempts.
However, this finding is not specific to major depression and is
associated more generally with violent and impulsive behavior.
Finally, perhaps the most
convincing line of evidence supporting the monoamine hypothesis is the
fact that (at the time of this writing) all available antidepressants
appear to have significant effects on the monoamine system. All classes
of antidepressants appear to enhance the synaptic availability of 5-HT,
norepinephrine, or dopamine. Attempts to develop antidepressants that
work on other neurotransmitter systems have not been effective to date.
The monoamine hypothesis, like
the neurotrophic hypothesis, is at best incomplete. Many studies have not
found an alteration in function or levels of monoamines in depressed
patients. In addition, some candidate antidepressant agents under study
do not act directly on the monoamine system. These include glutamate
antagonists, melatonin agonists, and glucocorticoid-specific agents.
Thus, monoamine function appears to be an important but not exclusive
factor in the pathophysiology of depression.
Neuroendocrine Factors in the
Pathophysiology of Depression
Depression is known to be
associated with a number of hormonal abnormalities. Among the most
replicated of these findings are abnormalities in the HPA axis in patients
with MDD. Moreover, MDD is associated with elevated cortisol levels
(Figure 30–1), nonsuppression of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)
release in the dexamethasone suppression test, and chronically elevated
levels of corticotropin-releasing hormone. The significance of these HPA
abnormalities is unclear, but they are thought to indicate a
dysregulation of the stress hormone axis. More severe types of
depression, such as psychotic depression, tend to be associated with HPA
abnormalities more commonly than milder forms of major depression. It is
well known that both exogenous glucocorticoids and endogenous elevation
of cortisol are associated with mood symptoms and cognitive deficits
similar to those seen in MDD.
Thyroid dysregulation has also
been reported in depressed patients. Up to 25% of depressed patients are
reported to have abnormal thyroid function. These include a blunting of
response of thyrotropin to thyrotropin-releasing hormone, and elevations
in circulating thyroxine during depressed states. Clinical hypothyroidism
often presents with depressive symptoms, which resolve with thyroid
hormone supplementation. Thyroid hormones are also commonly used in
conjunction with standard antidepressants to augment therapeutic effects
of the latter.
Finally, sex steroids are also
implicated in the pathophysiology of depression. Estrogen deficiency
states, which occur in the postpartum and postmenopausal periods, are
thought to play a role in the etiology of depression in some women.
Likewise, severe testosterone deficiency in men is sometimes associated
with depressive symptoms. Hormone replacement therapy in hypogonadal men
and women may be associated with an improvement in mood and depressive
symptoms.
Integration of Hypotheses
Regarding the Pathophysiology of Depression
The several pathophysiologic
hypotheses just described are not mutually exclusive. It is evident that
the monoamine, neuroendocrine, and neurotrophic systems are interrelated
in important ways. For example, HPA and steroid abnormalities may contribute
to suppression of transcription of the BDNF gene.
Glucocorticoid receptors are found in high density in the hippocampus.
Binding of these hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors by cortisol during
chronic stress states such as major depression may decrease BDNF
synthesis and may result in volume loss in stress-sensitive regions such
as the hippocampus. The chronic activation of monoamine receptors by
antidepressants appears to have the opposite effect of stress and results
in an increase in BDNF tran-scription. In addition, activation of
monoamine receptors appears to down-regulate the HPA axis and may
normalize HPA function.
One of the weaknesses of the
monoamine hypothesis is the fact that amine levels increase immediately
with antidepressant use, but maximum beneficial effects of
antidepressants are not seen for many weeks. The time required to
synthesize neurotrophic factors has been proposed as an explanation for
this delay of antidepressant effects. Appreciable protein synthesis of
products such as BDNF typically takes 2 weeks or longer and coincides
with the clinical course of antidepressant treatment.
|
|
Basic Pharmacology of Antidepressants
Chemistry and Subgroups
The currently available
antidepressants make up a remarkable variety of chemical types. These
differences and the differences in their molecular targets provide the
basis for distinguishing several subgroups.
Selective Serotonin Reuptake
Inhibitors
The selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitors (SSRIs) represent a chemically diverse class of agents that
have as their primary action the inhibition of the serotonin transporter
(SERT) (Figure 30–3). Fluoxetine was introduced in the United States in
1988 and quickly became one of the most commonly prescribed medications
in medical practice. The development of fluoxetine emerged out of the
search for chemicals that had high affinity for monoamine receptors but
lacked the affinity for histamine, acetylcholine, and adrenoceptors
that is seen with the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). There are
currently six available SSRIs, and they are the most common
antidepressants in clinical use. In addition to their use in major
depression, SSRIs have indications in GAD, PTSD, OCD, panic disorder,
PMDD, and bulimia. Fluoxetine, sertraline, and citalopram
exist as isomers and are formulated in the racemic forms, whereas paroxetine
and fluvoxamine are not optically active. Escitalopram
is the S enantiomer of citalopram. As with all antidepressants,
SSRIs are highly lipophilic. The popularity of SSRIs stems largely from
their ease of use, safety in overdose, relative tolerability, cost (all
except escitalopram are generically available), and broad spectrum of
uses.
Serotonin-Norepinephrine
Reuptake Inhibitors
Two classes of antidepressants
act as combined serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors:
selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and
tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs).
Selective
Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors
The SNRIs include venlafaxine,
its metabolite desvenlafaxine, and duloxetine. Another
SNRI, milnacipran, is in late clinical trials in the USA but has
been available in Europe for several years. In addition to their use in
major depression, other applications of the SNRIs include the treatment
of pain disorders including neuropathies and fibromyalgia. SNRIs are also
used in the treatment of generalized anxiety, stress urinary
incontinence, and vasomotor symptoms of menopause.
SNRIs are chemically unrelated
to each other. Venlafaxine was discovered in the process of evaluating
chemicals that inhibit binding of imipramine. Venlafaxine's in vivo
effects are similar to those of imipramine but with a more favorable
adverse-effect profile. All SNRIs bind the serotonin (SERT) and
norepinephrine (NET) transporters, as do the TCAs. However, unlike the
TCAs, the SNRIs do not have much affinity for other receptors.
Venlafaxine and desvenlafaxine are bicyclic compounds, whereas duloxetine
is a three-ring structure unrelated to the TCAs. Milnacipran contains a
cyclopropane ring and is provided as a racemic mixture.

Tricyclic Antidepressants
The TCAs were the dominant class
of antidepressants until the introduction of SSRIs in the 1980s and
1990s. Nine TCAs are available in the USA, and they all have an
iminodibenzyl (tricyclic) core (Figure 30–4). The chemical differences
between the TCAs are relatively subtle. For example, the prototype TCA imipramine
and its metabolite, desipramine, differ by only a methyl group in
the propylamine side chain. However, this minor difference results in a
substantial change in their pharmacologic profiles. Imipramine is highly
anticholinergic and is a relatively strong serotonin as well as
norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. In contrast, desipramine is much less
anticholinergic and is a more potent and somewhat more selective
norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor than is imipramine.
At the present time, the TCAs
are used primarily in depression that is unresponsive to more commonly
used antidepressants such as the SSRIs or SNRIs. Their loss of popularity
stems in large part from relatively poorer tolerability compared with
newer agents, to difficulty of use, and to lethality in overdose. Other
uses for TCAs include the treatment of pain conditions, enuresis, and
insomnia.
5-HT2 Antagonists
Two antidepressants are thought
to act primarily as antagonists at the 5-HT2 receptor: trazodone
and nefazodone. Trazodone's structure includes a triazolo moiety
that is thought to impart antidepressant effects. Its primary metabolite,
m-chlorphenylpiperazine (m-cpp), is a potent 5-HT2 antagonist.
Trazodone was among the most commonly prescribed antidepressants until it
was supplanted by the SSRIs in the late 1980s. The most common use of
trazodone in current practice is as an unlabeled hypnotic, since it is
highly sedating and not associated with tolerance or dependence.
Nefazodone is chemically related
to trazodone. Its primary metabolites, hydroxynefazodone and m-cpp are
both inhibitors of the 5-HT2 receptor. Nefazodone received an
FDA black box warning in 2001 implicating it in hepatotoxicity, including
lethal cases of hepatic failure. Though still available generically,
nefazodone is no longer commonly prescribed. The primary indications for
both nefazodone and trazodone are major depression, although both have
also been used in the treatment of anxiety disorders.

Tetracyclic and Unicyclic
Antidepressants
A number of antidepressants do
not fit neatly into the other classes. Among these are bupropion,mirtazapine,
amoxapine, and maprotiline (Figure 30–5). Bupropion has a
unicyclic aminoketone structure. Its unique structure results in a
different side-effect profile than most antidepressants (described
below). Bupropion somewhat resembles amphetamine in chemical structure
and like the stimulant, has central nervous system (CNS) activating
properties.
Mirtazapine was introduced in
1994 and, like bupropion, is one of the few antidepressants not commonly associated
with sexual side effects. It has a tetracyclic chemical structure and
belongs to the piperazino-azepine group of compounds.
Mirtazapine, amoxapine, and
maprotiline have tetracyclic structures. Amoxapine is the N-methylated
metabolite of loxapine, an older antipsychotic drug. Amoxapine and
maprotiline share structural similarities and side effects comparable to
the TCAs. As a result, these tetracyclics are not commonly prescribed in
current practice. Their primary use is in MDD that is unresponsive to
other agents.
Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors
Arguably the first modern class
of antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) were introduced
in the 1950s but are now rarely used in clinical practice because of
toxicity and potentially lethal food and drug interactions. Their primary
use now is in the treatment of depression unresponsive to other
antidepressants. However, MAOIs have also been used historically to treat
anxiety states, including social anxiety and panic disorder. In addition,
selegiline is used for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (see Chapter
28).
Current MAOIs include the
hydrazine derivatives phenelzine and isocarboxazid and the
non-hydrazines tranylcypromine, selegiline, and moclobemide
(the latter is not available in the USA). The hydrazines and
tranylcypromine bind irreversibly and nonselectively with MAO-A and -B,
whereas other MAOIs may have more selective or reversible properties.
Some of the MAOIs such as tranylcypromine resemble amphetamine in
chemical structure, whereas other MAOIs such as selegiline have
amphetamine-like metabolites. As a result, these MAOIs tend to have
substantial CNS-stimulating effects.

Pharmacokinetics
The antidepressants share
several pharmacokinetic features (Table 30–1). Most have fairly rapid
oral absorption, achieve peak plasma levels within 2–3 hours, are tightly
bound to plasma proteins, undergo hepatic metabolism, and are renally
cleared. However, even within classes, the pharmacokinetics of individual
antidepressants vary considerably.
|
Table 30–1 Pharmacokinetic
Profiles of Selected Antidepressants.
|
|
|
Class, Drug
|
Bioavailability
(%)
|
Plasma t1/2
(hours)
|
Active
Metabolite t1/2 (hours)
|
Volume of
Distribution (L/kg)
|
Protein
Binding (%)
|
|
SSRIs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citalopram
|
80
|
33–38
|
ND
|
15
|
80
|
|
Escitalopram
|
80
|
27–32
|
ND
|
12–15
|
80
|
|
Fluoxetine
|
70
|
48–72
|
180
|
12–97
|
95
|
|
Fluvoxamine
|
90
|
14–18
|
14–16
|
25
|
80
|
|
Paroxetine
|
50
|
20–23
|
ND
|
28–31
|
94
|
|
Sertraline
|
45
|
22–27
|
62–104
|
20
|
98
|
|
SNRIs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duloxetine
|
50
|
12–15
|
ND
|
10–14
|
90
|
|
Venlafaxine1
|
45
|
8–11
|
9–13
|
4–10
|
27
|
|
Tricyclics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amitriptyline
|
45
|
31–46
|
20–92
|
5–10
|
90
|
|
Clomipramine
|
50
|
19–37
|
54–77
|
7–20
|
97
|
|
Imipramine
|
40
|
9–24
|
14–62
|
15–30
|
84
|
|
5-HT2
antagonists
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nefazodone
|
20
|
2–4
|
ND
|
0.5–1
|
99
|
|
Trazodone
|
95
|
3–6
|
ND
|
1–3
|
96
|
|
Tetracyclics
and unicyclic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amoxapine
|
ND
|
7–12
|
5–30
|
0.9–1.2
|
90
|
|
Bupropion
|
70
|
11–14
|
15–25
|
20–30
|
84
|
|
Maprotiline
|
70
|
43–45
|
ND
|
23–27
|
88
|
|
Mirtazapine
|
50
|
20–40
|
20–40
|
3–7
|
85
|
|
MAOIs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phenelzine
|
ND
|
11
|
ND
|
ND
|
ND
|
|
Selegiline
|
4
|
8–10
|
9–11
|
8–10
|
99
|
|
|
1Desvenlafaxine has similar properties but is less
completely metabolized.
MAOIs,
monoamine oxidase inhibitors; ND, no data found; SNRIs,
serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; SSRIs, selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
|
Selective Serotonin Reuptake
Inhibitors
The prototype SSRI, fluoxetine,
differs from other SSRIs in some important respects (Table 30–1).
Fluoxetine is metabolized to an active product, norfluoxetine, which may
have plasma concentrations greater than those of fluoxetine. The
elimination half-life of norfluoxetine is about three times longer than
fluoxetine and contributes to the longest half-life of all the SSRIs. As
a result, fluoxetine has to be discontinued 4 weeks or longer before an
MAOI can be administered to mitigate the risk of serotonin syndrome.
Fluoxetine and paroxetine are
potent inhibitors of the CYP2D6 isoenzyme, and this contributes to
potential drug interactions (see drug interactions). In contrast,
fluvoxamine is an inhibitor of CYP3A4, whereas citalopram, escitalopram,
and sertraline have more modest CYP interactions.
Serotonin-Norepinephrine
Reuptake Inhibitors
Selective
Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors
Venlafaxine is extensively
metabolized in the liver via the CYP2D6 isoenzyme to O-desmethylvenlafaxine
(desvenlafaxine). Both have similar half-lives of about 11 hours. Despite
the relatively short half-lives, both drugs are available in formulations
that allow once-daily dosing. Venlafaxine and desvenlafaxine have the
lowest protein binding of all antidepressants (27–30%). Unlike most
antidepressants, desvenlafaxine is conjugated and does not undergo
extensive oxidative metabolism. At least 45% of desvenlafaxine is
excreted unchanged in the urine compared with 4–8% of venlafaxine.
Duloxetine is well absorbed and
has a half-life of about 12 hours but is dosed once daily. It is tightly
bound to protein (97%) and undergoes extensive oxidative metabolism via
CYP2D6 and CYP1A2. Hepatic impairment significantly alters duloxetine
levels unlike desvenlafaxine.
Tricyclic Antidepressants
The TCAs tend to be well
absorbed and have long half-lives (Table 30–1). As a result, most are
dosed once daily at night because of their sedating effects. TCAs undergo
extensive metabolism via demethylation, aromatic hydroxylation, and
glucuronide conjugation. Only about 5% of TCAs are excreted unchanged in
the urine. The TCAs are substrates of the CYP2D6 system, and the serum
levels of these agents tend to be substantially influenced by concurrent
administration of drugs such as fluoxetine. In addition, genetic
polymorphism for CYP2D6 may result in low or extensive metabolism of the
TCAs.
The secondary amine TCAs,
including desipramine and nortriptyline, lack active metabolites and have
fairly linear kinetics. These TCAs have a wide therapeutic window, and
serum levels are reliable in predicting response and toxicity.
5-HT2 Antagonists
Trazodone and nefazodone are
rapidly absorbed and undergo extensive hepatic metabolism. Both drugs are
extensively bound to protein and have limited bioavailability because of
extensive metabolism. Their short half-lives generally require split
dosing when used as antidepressants. However, trazodone is often
prescribed as a single dose at night as a hypnotic in lower doses than
are used in the treatment of depression. Both trazodone and nefazodone
have active metabolites that also exhibit 5-HT2 antagonism.
Nefazodone is a potent inhibitor of the CYP3A4 system and may interact
with drugs metabolized by this enzyme (see Drug Interactions).
Tetracyclic and Unicyclic
Agents
Bupropion is rapidly absorbed
and has a mean protein binding of 85%. It undergoes extensive hepatic
metabolism and has a substantial first-pass effect. It has three active
metabolites including hydroxybupropion; the latter is being developed as
an antidepressant. Bupropion has a biphasic elimination with the first
phase lasting about 1 hour and the second phase lasting 14 hours.
Amoxapine is also rapidly
absorbed with protein binding of about 85%. The half-life is variable,
and the drug is often given in divided doses. Amoxapine undergoes
extensive hepatic metabolism. One of the active metabolites,
7-hydroxyamoxapine, is a potent D2 blocker and is associated
with antipsychotic effects. Maprotiline is similarly well absorbed orally
and 88% bound to protein. It undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism.
Mirtazapine is demethylated
followed by hydroxylation and glucuronide conjugation. Several CYP
isozymes are involved in the metabolism of mirtazapine, including 2D6,
3A4, and 1A2. The half-life of mirtazapine is 20–40 hours, and it is
usually dosed once in the evening because of its sedating effects.
Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors
The different MAOIs are
metabolized via different pathways but tend to have extensive first-pass
effects that may substantially decrease bioavailability. Tranylcypromine
is ring hydroxylated and N-acetylated, whereas acetylation appears
to be a minor pathway for phenelzine. Selegiline is N-demethylated
and then hydroxylated. The MAOIs are well absorbed from the
gastrointestinal tract.
Because of the prominent
first-pass effects and their tendency to inhibit MAO in the gut
(resulting in tyramine pressor effects), alternative routes of
administration are being developed. For example, selegiline is available
in both transdermal and sublingual forms that bypass both gut and liver.
These routes decrease the risk of food interactions and provide
substantially increased bioavailability.
Pharmacodynamics
As previously noted, all currently
available antidepressants enhance monoamine neurotransmission by one of
several mechanisms. The most common mechanism is inhibition of the
activity of SERT, NET, or both monoamine transporters (Table 30–2).
Antidepressants that inhibit SERT, NET, or both include the SSRIs and
SNRIs (by definition), and the TCAs. Another mechanism for increasing the
availability of monoamines is inhibition of their enzymatic degradation
(the MAOIs). Additional strategies for enhancing monoamine tone include
binding presynaptic autoreceptors (mirtazapine) or specific postsynaptic
receptors (5-HT2 antagonists and mirtazapine). Ultimately, the
increased availability of monoamines for binding in the synaptic cleft
results in a cascade of events that enhance the transcription of some
proteins and the inhibition of others. It is the net production of these
proteins, including BDNF, glucocorticoid receptors, adrenoceptors,
and other proteins that appears to determine the benefits as well as the
toxicity of a given agent.
|
Table 30–2 Antidepressant
Effects on Several Receptors and Transporters.
|
|
|
Antidepressant
|
ACh M
|
1
|
H1
|
5-HT2
|
NET
|
SERT
|
|
Amitriptyline
|
+++
|
+++
|
++
|
0/+
|
+
|
++
|
|
Amoxapine
|
+
|
++
|
+
|
+++
|
++
|
+
|
|
Bupropion
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0/+
|
0
|
|
Citalopram,
escitalopram
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
0
|
+++
|
|
Clomipramine
|
+
|
++
|
+
|
+
|
++
|
+++
|
|
Desipramine
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
0/+
|
+++
|
+
|
|
Doxepin
|
++
|
+++
|
+++
|
0/+
|
+
|
+
|
|
Fluoxetine
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0/+
|
0
|
+++
|
|
Fluvoxamine
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
+++
|
|
Imipramine
|
++
|
+
|
+
|
0/+
|
+
|
++
|
|
Maprotiline
|
+
|
+
|
++
|
0/+
|
++
|
0
|
|
Mirtazapine
|
0
|
0
|
+++
|
+
|
+
|
0
|
|
Nefazodone
|
0
|
+
|
0
|
++
|
0/+
|
+
|
|
Nortriptyline
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
++
|
+
|
|
Paroxetine
|
+
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
+
|
+++
|
|
Protriptyline
|
+++
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+++
|
+
|
|
Sertraline
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
+++
|
|
Trazodone
|
0
|
++
|
0/+
|
++
|
0
|
+
|
|
Trimipramine
|
++
|
++
|
+++
|
0/+
|
0
|
0
|
|
Venlafaxine
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
+
|
++
|
|
|
ACh M, acetylcholine
muscarinic receptor; 1, alpha1-adrenoceptor;
H1, histamine1 receptor; 5-HT2,
serotonin 5-HT2 receptor; NET, norepinephrine transporter;
SERT, serotonin transporter. 0/+, minimal affinity; +, mild affinity;
++, moderate affinity; +++, high affinity.
|
Selective Serotonin Reuptake
Inhibitors
The serotonin transporter (SERT)
is a glycoprotein with 12 transmembrane regions embedded in the axon
terminal and cell body membranes of serotonergic neurons. When
extracellular serotonin binds to receptors on the transporter,
conformational changes occur in the transporter and serotonin, Na+,
and Cl– are moved into the cell. Binding of intracellular K+
then results in return of the transporter to its original conformation
and the release of serotonin inside the cell. SSRIs allosterically
inhibit the transporter by binding the receptor at a site other than
active binding site for serotonin. At therapeutic doses, about 80% of the
activity of the transporter is inhibited. Functional polymorphisms exist
for SERT that determine the activity of the transporter.
SSRIs have modest effects on
other neurotransmitters. Unlike TCAs and SNRIs, there is little evidence
that SSRIs have prominent effects on adrenoceptors
or the norepinephrine transporter, NET. Binding to the serotonin
transporter is associated with tonic inhibition of the dopamine system,
although there is substantial interindividual variability in this effect.
The SSRIs do not bind aggressively to histamine, muscarinic, or other
receptors.
Drugs that Block Both Serotonin
and Norepinephrine Transporters
A large number of
antidepressants have mixed inhibitory effects on both serotonin and
norepinephrine transporters. The newer agents in this class (venlafaxine
and duloxetine) are denoted by the acronym SNRIs, whereas the older group
(tricyclic antidepressants) are termed TCAs.
Serotonin-Norepinephrine
Reuptake Inhibitors
SNRIs bind both the serotonin
and the norepinephrine transporters. The NET is structurally very similar
to the 5-HT transporter. Like the serotonin transporter, it is a
12-transmembrane domain complex that allosterically binds norepinephrine.
The NET also has a moderate affinity for dopamine.
Venlafaxine is a weak inhibitor
of NET, whereas desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, and milnacipran are more
balanced inhibitors of both SERT and NET. Nonetheless, the affinity of
most SNRIs tends to be much greater for SERT than for NET. The SNRIs
differ from the TCAs in that they lack the potent antihistamine, -adrenergic
blocking, and anticholinergic effects of the TCAs. As a result, the SNRIs
tend to be favored over the TCAs in the treatment of MDD and pain
syndromes because of their better tolerability.
Tricyclic Antidepressants
The TCAs resemble the SNRIs in
function, and their antidepressant activity is thought to relate
primarily to their inhibition of 5-HT and norepinephrine reuptake. Within
the TCAs, there is considerable variability in affinity for SERT versus
NET. For example, clomipramine has relatively very little affinity for
NET but potently binds SERT. This selectivity for the serotonin
transporter contributes to clomipramine's known benefits in the treatment
of OCD. On the other hand, the secondary amine TCAs, desipramine and
nortriptyline, are relatively more selective for NET. Although the
tertiary amine TCA imipramine has more serotonin effects initially, its
metabolite, desipramine, then balances this effect with more NET inhibition.
Common adverse effects of the
TCAs, including dry mouth and constipation, are attributable to the
potent antimuscarinic effects of many of these drugs. The TCAs also tend
to be potent antagonists of the histamine H1 receptor. TCAs
such as doxepin are sometimes prescribed as hypnotics and used in
treatments for pruritus because of their antihistamine properties. The
blockade of adrenoceptors
can result in substantial orthostatic effects, particularly in older
patients.
5-HT2 Antagonists
The principle action of both
nefazodone and trazodone appears to be blockade of the 5-HT2A
receptor. Inhibition of this receptor in both animal and human studies is
associated with substantial antianxiety, antipsychotic, and
antidepressant effects. Conversely, agonists of the 5-HT2A
receptor, eg, lysergic acid (LSD) and mescaline, are often hallucinogenic
and anxiogenic. The 5-HT2A receptor is a G protein-coupled
receptor and is distributed throughout the neocortex.
Nefazodone is a weak inhibitor
of both SERT and NET but is a potent antagonist of the postsynaptic 5-HT2A
receptor, as are its metabolites. Trazodone is also a weak but selective
inhibitor of SERT with little effect on NET. Its primary metabolite,
m-cpp, is a potent 5-HT2 antagonist, and much of trazodone's
benefits as an antidepressant might be attributed to this effect.
Trazodone also has weak-to-moderate presynaptic -adrenergic
blocking properties and is a modest antagonist of the H1
receptor.
Tetracyclic and Unicyclic
Antidepressants
The actions of bupropion remain
poorly understood. Bupropion and its major metabolite hydroxybupropion
are modest-to-moderate inhibitors of norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake
in animal studies. However, these effects seem less than are typically
associated with antidepressant benefit. A more significant effect of
bupropion is presynaptic release of catecholamines. In animal studies,
bupropion appears to substantially increase the presynaptic availability
of norepinephrine and dopamine to a lesser extent. Bupropion has
virtually no direct effects on the serotonin system.
Mirtazapine has a complex
pharmacology. It is an antagonist of the presynaptic 2
autoreceptor and enhances the release of both norepinephrine and 5-HT. In
addition, mirtazapine is an antagonist of 5-HT2 and 5-HT3
receptors. Finally, mirtazapine is a potent H1 antagonist,
which is associated with the drug's sedative effects.
The actions of amoxapine and
maprotiline resemble those of TCAs such as desipramine. Both are potent
NET inhibitors and less potent SERT inhibitors. In addition, both possess
anticholinergic properties. Unlike the TCAs or other antidepressants,
amoxapine is a moderate inhibitor of the postsynaptic D2
receptor. As such, amoxapine possesses some antipsychotic properties.
Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors
MAOIs act by mitigating the
actions of monoamine oxidase in the neuron and increasing monoamine
content. There are two forms of monoamine oxidase. MAO-A is present in
both dopamine and norepinephrine neurons and is found primarily in the
brain, gut, placenta, and liver; its primary substrates are
norepinephrine, epinephrine, and serotonin. MAO-B is found primarily in
serotonergic and histaminergic neurons and is distributed in the brain,
liver, and platelets. MAO-B acts primarily on tyramine, phenylethylamine,
and benzylamine. Both MAO-A and -B metabolize tryptamine and dopamine.
MAOIs are classified by their
specificity for MAO-A or -B and whether their effects are reversible or
irreversible. Phenelzine and tranylcypromine are examples of
irreversible, nonselective MAOIs. Moclobemide is a reversible and
selective inhibitor of MAO-A but is not available in the USA. Moclobemide
can be displaced from MAO-A by tyramine, and this mitigates the risk of
food interactions. In contrast, selegiline is an irreversible
MAO-B–specific agent at low doses. Selegiline is useful in the treatment
of Parkinson's disease at these low doses, but at higher doses it becomes
a nonselective MAOI similar to other agents.
|
|
Clinical Pharmacology of Antidepressants
Clinical Indications
Depression
The FDA indication for the use
of the antidepressants in the treatment of major depression is fairly
broad. Most antidepressants are approved for both acute and long-term
treatment of major depression. Acute episodes of MDD tend to last about
6–14 months untreated but at least 20% of episodes last 2 years or
longer.
The goal of acute treatment of
MDD is remission of all symptoms. Since antidepressants may not achieve
their maximum benefit for 1–2 months or longer, it is not unusual for a
trial of therapy to last 8–12 weeks at therapeutic doses. The
antidepressants are successful in achieving remission in about 30–40% of
patients within a single trial of 8–12 weeks. If an inadequate response
is obtained, therapy is often switched to another agent or augmented by
addition of another drug. For example, bupropion, an atypical
antipsychotic, or mirtazapine might be added to an SSRI or SNRI to
augment antidepressant benefit if monotherapy is unsuccessful. Seventy to
eighty percent of patients are able to achieve remission with sequenced
augmentation or switching strategies. Once an adequate response is
achieved, continuation therapy is recommended for a minimum of 6–12 months
to reduce the substantial risk of relapse.
Approximately 85% of patients
who have a single episode of MDD will have at least one recurrence in a
lifetime. Many patients have multiple recurrences, and these recurrences
may progress to more serious, chronic, and treatment-resistant episodes.
Thus, it is not unusual for patients to require maintenance treatment to
prevent recurrences. Although maintenance treatment studies of more than
5 years are uncommon, long-term studies with TCAs, SNRIs, and SSRIs suggest
a significant protective benefit when given chronically. Thus, it is
commonly recommended that patients be considered for long-term
maintenance treatment if they have had two or more serious MDD episodes
in the previous 5 years or three or more serious episodes in a lifetime.
It is not clear whether
antidepressants are useful for all subtypes of depression. For example,
patients with bipolar depression may not benefit much from
antidepressants even when added to mood stabilizers. In fact, the
antidepressants are sometimes associated with switches into mania or more
rapid cycling. There has also been some debate about the overall efficacy
of antidepressants in unipolar depression, with some meta-analyses
showing large effects and others showing more modest effects. Although
this debate is not likely to be settled immediately, there is little
debate that antidepressants have important benefits for most patients.
Psychotherapeutic interventions
such as cognitive behavior therapy appear to be as effective as
antidepressant treatment for mild to moderate forms of depression.
However, cognitive behavior therapy tends to take longer to be effective
and is generally more expensive than antidepressant treatment.
Psychotherapy is often combined with antidepressant treatment, and the
combination appears more effective than either strategy alone.
Anxiety Disorders
After major depression, anxiety
disorders represent the most common application of antidepressants. A
number of SSRIs and SNRIs have been approved for all the major anxiety
disorders, including PTSD, OCD, social anxiety disorder, GAD, and panic
disorder. Panic disorder is characterized by recurrent episodes of brief
overwhelming anxiety, which often occur without precipitant. Patients may
begin to fear having an attack, or they avoid situations in which they
might have an attack. In contrast, GAD is characterized by a chronic,
free-floating anxiety and undue worry that tends to be chronic in nature.
Although older antidepressants and drugs of the sedative-hypnotic class
are still occasionally used for the treatment of anxiety disorders, SSRIs
and SNRIs have largely replaced them.
The benzodiazepines (see Chapter
22) provide much more rapid relief of both generalized anxiety and panic
than do any of the antidepressants. However, the antidepressants appear
to be at least as effective and perhaps more effective than
benzodiazepines in the long-term treatment of these anxiety disorders.
Furthermore, antidepressants do not carry the risks of dependence and
tolerance that may occur with the benzodiazepines.
OCD is known to respond to
serotonergic antidepressants. It is characterized by repetitive
anxiety-provoking thoughts (obsessions) or repetitive behaviors aimed at
reducing anxiety (compulsions). Clomipramine and several of the SSRIs are
approved for the treatment of OCD, and they are moderately effective.
Behavior therapy is usually combined with the antidepressant for
additional benefits.
Social anxiety disorder is an
uncommonly diagnosed but a fairly common condition in which the patient
experiences severe anxiety in social interactions. This anxiety may limit
their ability to function adequately in their jobs or interpersonal
relationships. Several SSRIs and venlafaxine are approved for the
treatment of social anxiety. The efficacy of the SSRIs in the treatment
of social anxiety is greater in some studies than their efficacy in the
treatment of MDD.
PTSD is manifested when a
traumatic or life-threatening event results in intrusive
anxiety-provoking thoughts or imagery, hypervigilance, nightmares, and
avoidance of situations that remind the patient of the trauma. SSRIs are
considered first-line treatment for PTSD and can benefit a number of
symptoms including anxious thoughts and hypervigilance. Other treatments,
including psychotherapeutic interventions, are usually required in
addition to antidepressants.
Pain Disorders
It has been known for over 40
years that antidepressants possess analgesic properties independent of
their mood effects. TCAs have been used in the treatment of neuropathic
and other pain conditions since the 1960s. Medications that possess both
norepinephrine and 5-HT reuptake blocking properties are often useful in
treating pain disorders. Ascending corticospinal monoamine pathways
appear to be important in the endogenous analgesic system. In addition,
chronic pain conditions are commonly associated with major depression.
TCAs continue to be commonly used for some of these conditions, and SNRIs
are increasingly used. The SNRI duloxetine was the first
antidepressant to secure FDA approval for the treatment of pain
associated with diabetic neuropathy and fibromyalgia. Other SNRIs, eg,
desvenlafaxine and milnacipran, are being investigated for a variety of
pain conditions from postherpetic neuralgia to chronic back pain.
Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder
Approximately 5% of women in the
child-bearing years will have prominent mood and physical symptoms during
the late luteal phase of almost every cycle; these may include anxiety,
depressed mood, irritability, insomnia, fatigue, and a variety of other
physical symptoms. These symptoms are more severe than those typically
seen in premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and can be quite disruptive to
vocational and interpersonal activities. The SSRIs are known to be beneficial
to many women with PMDD, and fluoxetine and sertraline have been approved
for this indication. Treating for 2 weeks out of the month in the luteal
phase may be as effective as continuous treatment. The rapid effects of
SSRIs in PMDD may be associated with rapid increases in pregnenolone
levels.
Smoking Cessation
Bupropion was approved in 1997
as a treatment for smoking cessation. Approximately twice as many people
treated with bupropion as with placebo have a reduced urge to smoke. In
addition, patients taking bupropion appear to experience fewer mood
symptoms and possibly less weight gain while withdrawing from nicotine
dependence. Bupropion appears to be about as effective as nicotine
patches in smoking cessation. The mechanism by which bupropion is helpful
in this application is unknown, but the drug may mimic nicotine's effects
on dopamine and norepinephrine and may antagonize nicotinic receptors.
Nicotine is also known to have antidepressant effects in some people, and
bupropion may substitute for this effect.
Other antidepressants may also
have a role in the treatment of smoking cessation. Nortriptyline has been
shown to be helpful in smoking cessation, but the effects have not been
as consistent as those seen with bupropion.
Eating Disorders
Bulimia nervosa and anorexia
nervosa are potentially devastating disorders. Bulimia is characterized
by episodic intake of large amounts of food (binges) followed by
ritualistic purging through emesis, the use of laxatives, or other
methods. Medical complications of the purging, such as hypokalemia, are
common and dangerous. Anorexia is a disorder in which reduced food intake
results in a loss of weight of 15% or more of ideal body weight, and the
person has a morbid fear of gaining weight and a highly distorted body
image. Anorexia is often chronic and may be fatal in 10% or more cases.
Antidepressants appear to be
helpful in the treatment of bulimia but not anorexia. Fluoxetine was
approved for the treatment of bulimia in 1996, and other antidepressants
have shown benefit in reducing the binge-purge cycle. The primary
treatment for anorexia at this time is refeeding, family therapy, and
cognitive behavioral therapy.
Bupropion may have some benefits
in treating obesity. Nondepressed, obese patients treated with bupropion
were able to lose somewhat more weight and maintain the loss relative to
a similar population treated with placebo. However, the weight loss was
not robust, and there appear to be more effective options for weight
loss.
Other Uses for Antidepressants
Antidepressants are used for
many other on- and off-label applications. Enuresis in children is an
older labeled use for some TCAs, but they are less commonly used now
because of their side effects. The SNRI duloxetine is approved in
Europe for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Many of the
serotonergic antidepressants appear to be helpful for treating vasomotor
symptoms in perimenopause. Desvenlafaxine is under consideration for FDA
approval for the treatment of these vasomotor symptoms, and studies have
suggested that SSRIs, venlafaxine, and nefazodone may also provide
benefit. Although serotonergic antidepressants are commonly associated
with inducing sexual adverse effects, some of these effects might prove
useful for some sexual disorders. For example, SSRIs are known to delay
orgasm in some patients. For this reason, SSRIs are sometimes used to
treat premature ejaculation. In addition, bupropion has been used to
treat sexual adverse effects associated with SSRI use, although its
efficacy for this use has not been consistently demonstrated in
controlled trials.
Choosing an Antidepressant
The choice of an antidepressant
depends first on the indication. Not all conditions are equally
responsive to all antidepressants. However, in the treatment of MDD, it
is difficult to demonstrate that one antidepressant is consistently more
effective than another. Thus, the choice of an antidepressant for the
treatment of depression rests primarily on practical considerations such
as cost, availability, adverse effects, potential drug interactions, the
patient's history of response or lack thereof, and patient preference.
Other factors such as the patient's age, gender, and medical status may
also guide antidepressant selection. For example, older patients are
particularly sensitive to the anticholinergic effects of the TCAs. On the
other hand, the CYP3A4-inhibiting effects of the SSRI fluvoxamine
may make this a problematic choice in some older patients because
fluvoxamine may interact with many other medications that an older
patient may require. There is some suggestion that female patients may
respond to and tolerate serotonergic better than noradrenergic or TCA
antidepressants, but the data supporting this gender difference have not
been consistent. Patients with narrow-angle glaucoma may have an
exacerbation with noradrenergic antidepressants, whereas bupropion and
other antidepressants are known to lower the seizure threshold in
epilepsy patients.
At present, SSRIs are the most
commonly prescribed first-line agents in the treatment of both MDD and
anxiety disorders. Their popularity comes from their ease of use,
tolerability, and safety in overdose. The starting dose of the SSRIs is
usually the same as the therapeutic dose for most patients, and so titration
may not be required. In addition, most SSRIs are now generically
available and inexpensive. Other agents, including the SNRIs, bupropion,
and mirtazapine, are also reasonable first-line agents for the treatment
of MDD. Bupropion, mirtazapine, and nefazodone are the antidepressants
with the least association with sexual side effects and are often
prescribed for this reason. However, bupropion is not thought to be
effective in the treatment of the anxiety disorders and may be poorly
tolerated in anxious patients. The primary indication for bupropion is in
the treatment of major depression, including seasonal (winter)
depression. Off-label uses of bupropion include the treatment of
attention deficit hyperkinetic disorder (ADHD), and bupropion is commonly
combined with other antidepressants to augment therapeutic response. The
primary indication for mirtazapine is in the treatment of major
depression. However, its strong antihistamine properties have contributed
to its occasional use as a hypnotic and as an adjunctive treatment to
more activating antidepressants.
The TCAs and MAOIs are now
relegated to second- or third-line treatments for MDD. Both the TCAs and
MAOIs are potentially lethal in overdose, require titration to achieve a
therapeutic dose, have serious drug interactions, and have many
troublesome adverse effects. As a consequence, their use in the treatment
of MDD or anxiety is now reserved for patients who have been unresponsive
to other agents. Clearly, there are patients whose depression responds only
to MAOIs or TCAs. Thus, TCAs and MAOIs are probably underused in
treatment-resistant depressed patients.
The use of antidepressants
outside the treatment of MDD tends to require specific agents. For
example, the TCAs and SNRIs appear to be useful in the treatment of pain
conditions, but other antidepressant classes appear to be far less
effective. SSRIs and the highly serotonergic TCA, clomipramine, are
effective in the treatment of OCD, but noradrenergic antidepressants have
not proved to be as helpful for this condition. Bupropion and
nortriptyline have usefulness in the treatment of smoking cessation, but
SSRIs have not been proven useful. Thus, outside the treatment of
depression, the choice of antidepressant is primarily dependent on the
known benefit of a particular antidepressant or class for a particular
indication.
Dosing
The optimal dose of an
antidepressant depends on the indication and on the patient. For SSRIs,
SNRIs, and a number of newer agents, the starting dose for the treatment
of depression is usually a therapeutic dose (Table 30–3). Patients who
show little or no benefit after at least 4 weeks of treatment may benefit
from a higher dose even though it has been difficult to show a clear
advantage for higher doses with SSRIs, SNRIs, and other newer
antidepressants. The dose is generally titrated to the maximum dosage
recommended or to the highest dosage tolerated if the patient is not
responsive to lower doses. Some patients may benefit from doses lower
than the usual minimum recommended therapeutic dose. TCAs and MAOIs
typically require titration to a therapeutic dosage over several weeks.
Dosing of the TCAs may be guided by monitoring TCA serum levels.
|
Table 30–3 Antidepressant
Dose Ranges.
|
|
|
Drug
|
Usual Therapeutic
Dosage (mg/d)
|
|
SSRIs
|
|
|
Citalopram
|
20–60
|
|
Escitalopram
|
10–30
|
|
Fluoxetine
|
20–60
|
|
Fluvoxamine
|
100–300
|
|
Paroxetine
|
20–60
|
|
Sertraline
|
50–200
|
|
SNRIs
|
|
|
Venlafaxine
|
75–375
|
|
Desvenlafaxine
|
50–200
|
|
Duloxetine
|
40–120
|
|
Tricyclics
|
|
|
Amitriptyline
|
150–300
|
|
Clomipramine
|
100–250
|
|
Desipramine
|
150–300
|
|
Doxepin
|
150–300
|
|
Imipramine
|
150–300
|
|
Nortriptyline
|
50–150
|
|
Protriptyline
|
15–60
|
|
Trimipramine
maleate
|
150–300
|
|
5-HT2
antagonists
|
|
|
Nefazodone
|
300–500
|
|
Trazodone
|
150–300
|
|
Tetracyclics
and unicyclics
|
|
|
Amoxapine
|
150–400
|
|
Bupropion
|
200–450
|
|
Maprotiline
|
150–225
|
|
Mirtazapine
|
15–45
|
|
MAOIs
|
|
Isocarboxazid
|
30–60
|
|
Phenelzine
|
45–90
|
|
Selegiline
|
20–50
|
|
Tranylcypromine
|
30–60
|
|
MAOIs,
monoamine oxidase inhibitors; SNRIs, serotonin-norepinephrine
reuptake inhibitors; SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
|
|
|
|
Some anxiety disorders may
require higher doses of antidepressants than are used in the treatment of
major depression. For example, patients treated for OCD often require
maximum or somewhat higher than maximum recommended MDD doses to achieve
optimal benefits. Likewise, the minimum dose of paroxetine for the
effective treatment of panic disorder is higher than the minimum dose
required for the effective treatment of depression.
In the treatment of pain
disorders, modest doses of TCAs are often sufficient. For example, 25–50
mg/d of imipramine might be beneficial in the treatment of pain
associated with a neuropathy but this would be a subtherapeutic dose in
the treatment of MDD. In contrast, SNRIs are usually prescribed in pain
disorders at the same doses used in the treatment of depression.
Adverse Effects
Although some potential adverse
effects are common to all antidepressants, most of their adverse effects
are specific to a subclass of agents and to their pharmacodynamic
effects. An FDA warning applied to all antidepressants is the risk of
increased suicidality in patients under the age 25. The warning suggests
that use of antidepressants is associated with suicidal ideation and
gestures, but not completed suicides, in up to 4% of patients under 25
years who were prescribed antidepressant in clinical trials. This rate is
about twice the rate seen with placebo treatment. For those over 25,
there is either no increased risk, or a reduced risk of suicidal thoughts
and gestures on antidepressants, particularly after age 65. Although a
small minority of patients may experience a treatment-emergent increase
in suicidal ideation with antidepressants, the absence of treatment of a
major depressive episode in all age groups is a particularly important
risk factor in completed suicides.
Selective Serotonin Reuptake
Inhibitors
The adverse effects of the most
commonly prescribed antidepressants—the SSRIs—can be predicted from their
potent inhibition of SERT. SSRIs enhance serotonergic tone, not just in
the brain but throughout the body. Increased serotonergic activity in the
gut is commonly associated with nausea, gastrointestinal upset, diarrhea,
and other gastrointestinal symptoms. Gastrointestinal adverse effects
usually emerge early in the course of treatment and tend to improve after
the first week. Increasing serotonergic tone at the level of the spinal
cord and above is associated with diminished sexual function and interest.
As a result, at least 30–40% of patients treated with SSRIs report loss
of libido, delayed orgasm, or diminished arousal. The sexual effects
often persist as long as the patient remains on the antidepressant but
may diminish with time.
Other adverse effects related to
the serotonergic effects of SSRIs include an increase in headaches and
insomnia or hypersomnia. Some patients gain weight while taking SSRIs,
particularly paroxetine. Sudden discontinuation of short half-life SSRIs
such as paroxetine and sertraline is associated with a discontinuation
syndrome in some patients characterized by dizziness, paresthesias, and
other symptoms beginning 1 or 2 days after stopping the drug and
persisting for 1 week or longer.
Serotonin-Norepinephrine
Reuptake Inhibitors and Tricyclic Antidepressants
SNRIs have many of the
serotonergic adverse effects associated with SSRIs. In addition, SNRIs
may also have noradrenergic effects, including increased blood pressure
and heart rate, and CNS activation, such as insomnia, anxiety, and
agitation. The hemodynamic effects of SNRIs tend not to be problematic in
most patients. A dose-related increase in blood pressure has been seen
more commonly with the immediate-release form of venlafaxine than with
other SNRIs. Likewise, there are more reports of cardiac toxicity with
venlafaxine overdose than with either the other SNRIs or SSRIs.
Duloxetine is rarely associated with hepatic toxicity in patients with a
history of liver damage. All the SNRIs have been associated with a
discontinuation syndrome resembling that seen with SSRI discontinuation.
The primary adverse effects of
TCAs have been described in the previous text. Anticholinergic effects
are perhaps the most common. These effects result in dry mouth,
constipation, urinary retention, blurred vision, and confusion. They are
more common with tertiary amine TCAs such as amitriptyline and imipramine
than with the secondary amine TCAs desipramine and nortriptyline. The
potent -blocking
property of TCAs often results in orthostatic hypotension. H1
antagonism by the TCAs is associated with weight gain and sedation. The
TCAs are class 1A antiarrhythmic agents (see Chapter 14) and are arrhythmogenic
at higher doses. Sexual effects are common, particularly with highly
serotonergic TCAs such as clomipramine. The TCAs have a prominent
discontinuation syndrome characterized by cholinergic rebound and flulike
symptoms.
5-HT2 Antagonists
The most common adverse effects
associated with the 5-HT2 antagonists are sedation and
gastrointestinal disturbances. Sedative effects, particularly with
trazodone, can be quite pronounced. Thus, it is not surprising that the
treatment of insomnia is currently the primary application of trazodone.
The gastrointestinal effects appear to be dose-related and are less
pronounced than those seen with SNRIs or SSRIs. Sexual effects are
uncommon with nefazodone or trazodone treatment as a result of the
relatively selective serotonergic effects of these drugs on the 5-HT2
receptor rather than on SERT. However, trazodone has rarely been
associated with inducing priapism. The effects of both nefazodone and
trazodone since -blocking
agents result in a dose-related orthostatic hypotension in some patients.
Nefazodone has been associated with hepatotoxicity, including rare
fatalities and cases of fulminant hepatic failure requiring
transplantation. The rate of serious hepatoxicity with nefazodone has
been estimated at 1 in 250,000 to 1 in 300,000 patient-years of
nefazodone treatment.
Tetracyclics and Unicyclics
Amoxapine is sometimes
associated with a parkinsonian syndrome due to its D2-blocking
action. Mirtazapine has significant sedative effect. Maprotiline has a
high affinity for NET, may cause TCA-like adverse effects and, rarely,
seizures. Bupropion is occasionally associated with agitation, insomnia,
and anorexia.
Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors
The most common adverse effects
of the MAOIs leading to discontinuation of these drugs are orthostatic
hypotension and weight gain. In addition, the irreversible nonselective
MAOIs are associated with the highest rates of sexual effects of all the
antidepressants. Anorgasmia is fairly common with therapeutic doses of
some MAOIs. The amphetamine-like properties of some MAOIs contributes to
activation, insomnia, and restlessness in some patients. Phenelzine tends
to be more sedating than either selegiline or tranylcypromine. Confusion
is also sometimes associated with higher doses of MAOIs. Because they
block metabolism of tyramine and similar ingested amines, MAOIs may cause
dangerous interactions with certain foods and with serotonergic drugs
(see Interactions). Finally, MAOIs have been associated with a sudden
discontinuation syndrome manifested in a delirium-like presentation with
psychosis, excitement, and confusion.
Overdose
Suicide attempts are a common
and unfortunate consequence of major depression. The lifetime risk of
completing suicide in patients previously hospitalized with MDD may be as
high as 15%. Overdose is the most common method used in suicide attempts,
and antidepressants, especially the TCAs, are frequently involved.
Overdose can induce lethal arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia
and fibrillation. In addition, blood pressure changes and anticholinergic
effects including altered mental status and seizures are sometimes seen
in TCA overdoses. A 1500 mg dose of imipramine or amitriptyline (less
than 7 days' supply at antidepressant doses) is enough to be lethal in
many patients. Toddlers taking 100 mg will likely show evidence of
toxicity. Treatment typically involves cardiac monitoring, airway
support, and gastric lavage. Sodium bicarbonate is often administered to
uncouple the TCA from cardiac sodium channels.
An overdose with an MAOI can
produce a variety of effects including autonomic instability,
hyperadrenergic symptoms, psychotic symptoms, confusion, delirium, fever,
and seizures. Management of MAOI overdoses usually involves cardiac
monitoring, vital support, and lavage.
Compared with TCAs and MAOIs,
the other antidepressants are generally much safer in overdose.
Fatalities with SSRI overdose alone are extremely uncommon. Similarly,
SNRIs tend to be much safer in overdose than the TCAs. However,
venlafaxine has been associated with some cardiac toxicity in overdose
and appears to be less safe than SSRIs. Bupropion is associated with
seizures in overdose, and mirtazapine may be associated with sedation,
disorientation, and tachycardia. With the newer agents, fatal overdoses
often involve the combination of the antidepressant with other drugs,
including alcohol. Management of overdose with the newer antidepressants
usually uses emptying of gastric contents and vital sign support as the
initial intervention.
Drug Interactions
Antidepressants are commonly
prescribed with other psychotropic and nonpsychotropic agents. There is potential
for drug interactions with all antidepressants, but the most serious of
these involve the MAOIs and to a lesser extent the TCAs.
Selective Serotonin Reuptake
Inhibitors
The most common interactions
with SSRIs are pharmacokinetic interactions. For example, paroxetine and
fluoxetine are potent CYP2D6 inhibitors (Table 30–4). Thus,
administration with 2D6 substrates such as TCAs can lead to dramatic and
sometimes unpredictable elevations in the tricyclic drug concentration.
The result may be toxicity from the TCA. Similarly, fluvoxamine, a CYP3A4
inhibitor, may elevate the levels of concurrently administered substrates
for this enzyme such as diltiazem and induce bradycardia or hypotension.
Other SSRIs, such as citalopram and escitalopram, are relatively free of
pharmacokinetic interactions. The most serious interaction with the SSRIs
are pharmacodynamic interactions with MAOIs that produce a serotonin
syndrome (see below).
|
Table 30–4
Antidepressant–CYP450 Drug Interactions.
|
|
|
Enzyme
|
Substrates
|
Inhibitors
|
Inducers
|
|
1A2
|
Tertiary
amine TCAs, duloxetine, theophylline, phenacetin, TCAs
(demethylation), clozapine, diazepam, caffeine
|
Fluvoxamine,
fluoxetine, moclobemide, ramelteon
|
Tobacco,
omeprazole
|
|
2C19
|
TCAs,
citalopram (partly), warfarin, tolbutamide, phenytoin, diazepam
|
Fluoxetine,
fluvoxamine, sertraline, imipramine, ketoconozole, omeprazole
|
Rifampin
|
|
2D6
|
Tricyclic
antidepressants (TCAs), benztropine, perphenazine, clozapine,
haloperidol, codeine/oxycodone, risperidone, class Ic
antiarrhythmics, blockers, trazodone, paroxetine,
maprotiline, amoxapine, duloxetine, mirtazapine (partly), venlafaxine,
bupropion
|
Fluoxetine,
paroxetine, duloxetine, hydroxybupropion, methadone, cimetidine,
haloperidol, quinidine, ritonavir
|
Phenobarbital,
rifampin
|
|
3A4
|
Citalopram,
escitalopram, TCAs , glucocorticoids, androgens/estrogens, carbamazepine,
erythromycin, Ca2+ channel blockers, protease inhibitors,
sildenafil, alprazolam, triazolam, vincristine/vinblastine,
tamoxifen, zolpidem
|
Fluvoxamine,
nefazodone, sertraline, fluoxetine, cimetidine, fluconazole,
erythromycin, protease inhibitors, ketoconazole, verapamil
|
Barbiturates,
glucocorticoids, rifampin, modafinil, carbamazepine
|
|
|
|
Selective
Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors and Tricyclic
Antidepressants
The SNRIs have relatively fewer
CYP450 interactions than the SSRIs. Venlafaxine is a substrate but not an
inhibitor of CYP2D6 or other isoenzymes, whereas desvenlafaxine is a
minor substrate for CYP3A4. Duloxetine is a moderate inhibitor of CYP2D6
and so may elevate TCA and other CYP2D6 substrate levels. Like all
serotonergic antidepressants, SNRIs are contraindicated in combination
with MAOIs.
Elevations of TCA levels may
occur when combined with CYP2D6 inhibitors or from constitutional
factors. About 7% of the Caucasian population in the USA has a CYP2D6
polymorphism that is associated with slow metabolism of TCAs and other
2D6 substrates. Combination of a known CYP2D6 inhibitor and a TCA in a
patient who is a slow metabolizer may result in additive effects. Such an
interaction has been implicated, though rarely, in cases of TCA toxicity.
There may also be additive TCA effects such as anticholinergic or
antihistamine effects when combined with other agents that share these
properties such as benztropine or diphenhydramine. Similarly, antihypertensive
drugs may exacerbate the orthostatic hypotension induced by TCAs.
5-HT2 Antagonists
Nefazodone is an inhibitor of
the CYP3A4 isoenzyme, so it can raise the level and thus exacerbate
adverse effects of many 3A4-dependent drugs. For example, triazolam levels
are increased by concurrent administration of nefazodone such that a
reduction in triazolam dosage by 75% is recommended. Likewise,
administration of nefazodone with simvastatin has been associated with
20-fold increase in plasma levels of simvastatin.
Trazodone is a substrate but not
a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4. As a result, combining trazodone with
potent inhibitors of CYP3A4, such as ritonavir or ketoconazole, may lead
to substantial increases in trazodone levels.
Tetracyclic and Unicyclic
Antidepressants
Bupropion is metabolized
primarily by CYP2B6, and its metabolism may be altered by drugs such as
cyclophosphamide, which is a substrate of 2B6. The major metabolite of
bupropion, hydroxybupropion, is a moderate inhibitor of CYP2D6 and so can
raise desipramine levels. Bupropion should be avoided in patients taking
MAOIs.
Mirtazapine is a substrate for
several CYP450 enzymes including 2D6, 3A4, and 1A2. Consequently, drugs
that inhibit these isozymes may raise mirtazapine levels. However,
mirtazapine is not an inhibitor of these enzymes. The sedating effects of
mirtazapine may be additive with those of CNS depressants such as alcohol
and benzodiazepines.
Amoxapine and maprotiline share
most drug interactions common to the TCA group. Both are CYP2D6 substrates
and should be used with caution in combination with inhibitors such as
fluoxetine. Amoxapine and maprotiline also both have anticholinergic and
antihistaminic properties that may be additive with drugs that share a
similar profile.
Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors
MAOIs are associated with two
classes of serious drug interactions. The first of these is the
pharmacodynamic interaction of MAOIs with serotonergic agents including
SSRIs, SNRIs, and most TCAs along with some analgesic agents such as
meperidine. These combinations of an MAOI with a serotonergic agent may
result in a life-threatening serotonin syndrome (see Chapter 16).
The serotonin syndrome is thought to be caused by overstimulation of 5-HT
receptors in the central gray nuclei and the medulla. Symptoms range from
mild to lethal and include a triad of cognitive (delirium, coma),
autonomic (hypertension, tachycardia, diaphoreses) and somatic
(myoclonus, hyperreflexia, tremor) effects. Most serotonergic
antidepressants should be discontinued at least 2 weeks before starting
an MAOI. Fluoxetine, because of its long half-life, should be
discontinued for 4–5 weeks before an MAOI is initiated. Conversely, an
MAOI must be discontinued for at least 2 weeks before starting a
serotonergic agent.
The second serious interaction
with MAOIs occurs when an MAOI is combined with tyramine in the diet or
with sympathomimetic substrates of MAO. An MAOI prevents the breakdown of
tyramine in the gut, and this results in high serum levels that enhance
peripheral noradrenergic effects, including raising blood pressure
dramatically. Patients on an MAOI who ingest large amounts of dietary
tyramine may experience malignanthypertension and subsequently a stroke
or myocardial infarction. Thus, patients taking MAOIs require a low
tyramine diet and should avoid foods such as aged cheeses, tap beer, soy
products, and dried sausages, which contain high amounts of tyramine (see
Chapter 9). Similar sympathomimetics also may cause significant
hypertension when combined with MAOIs. Thus, over-the-counter cold
preparations that contain pseudoephedrine and phenylpropanolamine are
contraindicated in patients taking MAOIs.
|
|
Summary: Antidepressants
|
|
|
Subclass
|
Mechanism of
Action
|
Effects
|
Clinical Applications
|
Pharmacokinetics,
Toxicities, Interactions
|
|
Selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)
|
|
Fluoxetine
|
Highly
selective blockade of serotonin transporter (SERT) little effect on norepinephrine
transporter (NET)
|
Acute
increase of serotonergic synaptic activity slower changes in several signaling
pathways and neurotrophic activity
|
Major
depression, anxiety disorders panic disorder obsessive-compulsive disorder post-traumatic stress disorder perimenopausal vasomotor symptoms eating disorder (bulimia)
|
Half-lives
from 15–75 h oral activity Toxicity: Well tolerated but
cause sexual dysfunction Interactions: Some CYP
inhibition (fluoxetine 2D6, 3A4; fluvoxamine 1A2; paroxetine 2D6)
|
|
Citalopram
|
|
Escitalopram
|
|
Paroxetine
|
|
Sertraline
|
|
Fluvoxamine:
Similar to above but approved only for obsessive-compulsive behavior
|
|
Serotonin-norepinephrine
reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs)
|
|
Duloxetine
|
Moderately
selective blockade of NET and SERT
|
Acute
increase in serotonergic and adrenergic synaptic activity otherwise like SSRIs
|
Major
depression, chronic pain disorders fibromyalgia, perimenopausal
symptoms
|
Toxicity:
Anticholinergic, sedation, hypertension (venlafaxine) Interactions: Some CYP2D6
inhibition (duloxetine, desvenlafaxine)
|
|
Venlafaxine
|
|
Desvenlafaxine:
Desmethyl metabolite of venlafaxine, metabolism is by phase II rather
than CYP phase I
|
|
Tricyclic
antidepressants (TCAs)
|
|
Imipramine
|
Mixed and
variable blockade of NET and SERT
|
Like SNRIs
plus significant blockade of autonomic nervous system and histamine
receptors
|
Major
depression not responsive to other drugs chronic pain disorders incontinence obsessive-compulsive disorder
(clomipramine)
|
Long
half-lives CYP substrates active metabolites Toxicity: Anticholinergic, -blocking effects, sedation, weight
gain, arrhythmias, and seizures in overdose Interactions: CYP inducers
and inhibitors
|
|
Many
others
|
|
5-HT2
Antagonists
|
|
Nefazodone
|
Inhibition
of 5-HT2A receptor nefazodone also blocks SERT
weakly
|
Trazodone
forms a metabolite (m-cpp) that blocks 5-HT2A,2C receptors
|
Major
depression sedation and hypnosis (trazodone)
|
Relatively
short half-lives active metabolites Toxicity: Modest - and H1-receptor
blockade (trazodone) Interactions: Nefazodone
inhibits CYP3A4
|
|
Trazodone
|
|
Tetracyclics,
unicyclic
|
|
Bupropion
|
Increased
norepinephrine and dopamine activity (bupropion) NET > SERT inhibition
(amoxapine, maprotiline) increased release of
norepinephrine, 5-HT (mirtazapine)
|
Presynaptic
release of catecholamines but no effect on 5-HT (bupropion) amoxapine and maprotiline
resemble TCAs
|
Major
depression smoking cessation (bupropion) sedation (mirtazapine) amoxapine and maprotiline
rarely used
|
Extensive
metabolism in liver Toxicity: Lowers seizure
threshold (amoxapine, bupropion); sedation and weight gain
(mirtazepine) Interactions: CYP2D6
inhibitor (bupropion)
|
|
Amoxapine
|
|
Maprotiline
|
|
Mirtazapine
|
|
Monoamine
oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs)
|
|
Phenelzine
|
Blockade of
MAO-A and MAO-B (phenelzine, nonselective) MAO-B irreversible selective MAO-B
inhibition (low dose selegiline)
|
Transdermal
absorption of selegiline achieves levels that inhibit MAO-A
|
Major
depression unresponsive to other drugs
|
Very slow
elimination Toxicity: Hypotension,
insomnia Interactions: Hypertensive
crisis with tyramine, other indirect sympathomimetics serotonin syndrome with
serotonergic agents, meperidine
|
|
Tranylcypromine
|
|
Selegiline
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preparations Available
Selective Serotonin Reuptake
Inhibitors
|
|
Citalopram (generic, Celexa)
|
|
Oral:
10, 20, 40 mg tablets; 10 mg/5 mL solution
|
Escitalopram
(Lexapro)
|
|
Oral:
5, 10, 20 mg tablets; 5 mg/5 mL solution
|
Fluoxetine (generic, Prozac)
|
|
Oral:
10, 20, 40 mg capsules; 10, 20 mg tablets; 20 mg/5 mL liquid
Oral
delayed-release (Prozac Weekly): 90 mg capsules
|
Fluvoxamine
(generic, labeled only for
obsessive-compulsive disorder)
|
|
Oral:
25, 50, 100 mg tablets
|
Paroxetine
(generic, Paxil)
|
|
Oral:
10, 20, 30, 40 mg tablets; 10 mg/5 mL suspension; 12.5, 25, 37.5 mg
controlled-release tablets
|
Sertraline
(generic, Zoloft)
|
|
Oral:
25, 50, 100 mg tablets; 20 mg/mL oral concentrate
|
|
Selective Norepinephrine
Reuptake Inhibitors
|
|
Desvenlafaxine
(Pristique)
|
|
Oral:
50, 100 mg capsules
|
Duloxetine (Cymbalta)
|
|
Oral:
20, 30, 50 mg capsules
|
Venlafaxine (Effexor)
|
|
Oral:
25, 37.5, 50, 75, 100 mg tablets; 37.5, 75, 150 mg extended-release
capsules
|
|
5-HT2 Antagonists
|
|
Nefazodone (generic)
|
|
Oral:
50, 100, 150, 200, 250 mg tablets
|
Trazodone (generic, Desyrel)
|
|
Oral:
50, 100, 150, 300 mg tablets
|
|
Tricyclics
|
|
Amitriptyline (generic, Elavil)
|
|
Oral:
10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150 mg tablets
Parenteral:
10 mg/mL for IM injection
|
Amoxapine (generic)
|
|
Oral:
25, 50, 100, 150 mg tablets
|
Clomipramine (generic, Anafranil; labeled only for
obsessive-compulsive disorder)
|
|
Oral:
25, 50, 75 mg capsules
|
Desipramine
(generic, Norpramin)
|
|
Oral:
10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150 mg tablets
|
Doxepin (generic, Sinequan)
|
|
Oral:
10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150 mg capsules; 10 mg/mL concentrate
|
Imipramine (generic, Tofranil)
|
|
Oral:
10, 25, 50 mg tablets (as hydrochloride); 75, 100, 125, 150 mg
capsules (as pamoate)
|
Protriptyline (generic, Vivactil)
Trimipramine (Surmontil)
|
|
Oral:
25, 50, 100 mg capsules
|
|
Tetracyclic and Unicyclic
Agents
|
|
Amoxipine
(generic)
|
|
Oral:
25, 50, 100, 150 mg tablets
|
Bupropion
(generic, Wellbutrin)
|
|
Oral:
75, 100 mg tablets; 100, 150, 200 mg 12-hour sustained-release
tablets; 150, 300 mg 24-hour sustained-release tablets
Oral:
25, 50, 75 mg tablets
|
Maprotiline
(generic, Remeron)
|
|
Oral:
7.5, 15, 30, 45 mg tablets; 15, 30, 45 mg oral disintegrating tablets
|
Mirtazapine
(generic, Remeron)
|
|
Oral:
7.5, 15, 30, 45 mg tablets; 15, 30, 45 mg disintegrating tablets
|
|
Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors
|
|
Isocarboxazid
(generic, Marplan)
Phenelzine
(generic, Nardil)
Selegiline
|
|
Oral
(generic, Eldepryl): 5 mg tablets, capsules; 1.25 oral disintegrating
tablets
|
Tranylcypromine
(generic, Parnate)
|
|
|
References
|
Alessandro S, Kato M: The
serotonin transporter gene and effectiveness of SSRIs. Expert Rev
Neurother 2008;8(1):111. [PMID: 18088204]
|
|
Arnold LM: Duloxetine and
other antidepressants in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia.
Pain Med 1997;8(Suppl 2):S63.
|
|
Asberg M, Martensson B:
Serotonin selective antidepressant drugs: Past, present, future. Clin
Neuropharmacol 1993;16(Suppl 3):S32.
|
|
Barrera AZ, Torres LD, Munoz
RF: Prevention of depression: The state of the science at the beginning
of the 21st Century. Int Rev Psychiatry 2007;19(6):655. [PMID:
18092243]
|
|
Baum AL, Misri S: Selective
serotonin-reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy and lactation. Harv Rev
Psychiatry 1996;4(3):117. [PMID: 9384984]
|
|
Baumann P:
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of the selective serotonin
reuptake inhibitors. Clin Pharmacokinet 1996; 31(6):444. [PMID:
8968657]
|
|
Basu M, Duckett J: The treatment
of urinary incontinence with Duloxetine. J Obstet Gynaecol
2008;28(2):166. [PMID: 18393011]
|
|
Belmaker R, Agam G: Major
depressive disorder. N Engl J Med 2008;358:55. [PMID: 18172175]
|
|
Benkert O, Muller M, Szegedi
A: An overview of the clinical efficacy of mirtazapine. Hum
Psychopharmacol 2002;17(Suppl 1):S23.
|
|
Bockting CL et al:
Continuation and maintenance use of antidepressants in recurrent
depression. Psychother Psychosom 2008;77(1):17. [PMID: 18087204]
|
|
Bonisch H, Bruss M: The
norepinephrine transporter in physiology and disease. Handb Exp
Pharmacol 2006;175:485. [PMID: 16722247]
|
|
Castren E, Voikar V, Rantamaki
T: Role of neurotrophic factors in depression. Curr Opin Pharmacol
2007;7(1):18. [PMID: 17049922]
|
|
Catterson ML, Preskorn SH:
Pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Clinical
relevance. Pharmacol Toxicol 1996; 78(4):203. [PMID: 8861776]
|
|
Choi S: Nefazodone (Serzone)
withdrawn because of hepatotoxicity. CMAJ 2003;169(11):1187. [PMID:
14638657]
|
|
Cipriani A et al: Fluoxetine
versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev 2005;(4):CD004185.
|
|
Cipriani A et al: Metareview
on short-term effectiveness and safety of antidepressants for
depression: An evidence-based approach to inform clinical practice. Can
J Psychiatry 2007;52(9):553. [PMID: 17953159]
|
|
Cohen LJ, De Vane CL: Clinical
implications of antidepressant pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics.
Ann Pharmacother 1996;30(12):1471. [PMID: 8968460]
|
|
Cole JO: New directions in
antidepressant therapy: A review of sertraline, a unique serotonin
reuptake inhibitor. J Clin Psychiatry 1992;53(9):333. [PMID: 1387636]
|
|
Cyr M, Brown CS: Nefazodone:
Its place among antidepressants. Ann Pharmacother 1996;30(9):1006.
[PMID: 8876863]
|
|
Dawson JK, Earnshaw SM,Graham
CS: Dangerous monoamine oxidase inhibitor interactions are still
occurring in the 1990s. J Accid Emerg Med 1995;12(1):49. [PMID:
7640830]
|
|
de Beaurepaire R: Questions
raised by the cytokine hypothesis of depression. Brain Behav Immun
2002;16(5):610.
|
|
Delgado PL: Depression: The
case for a monoamine deficiency. J Clin Psychiatry 2000;61(Suppl 6):7.
|
|
Delgado PL: How antidepressants
help depression: Mechanisms of action and clinical response. J Clin
Psychiatry 2004;65(Suppl 4):25.
|
|
Dhillon S, Scott LJ, Plosker
GL: Escitalopram: A review of its use in the management of anxiety
disorders. CNS Drugs 2006;20(9):763. [PMID: 16953656]
|
|
Dhillon S, Yang LP, Curran MP:
Bupropion: A review of its use in the management of major depressive
disorder. Drugs 2008;68(5):653. [PMID: 18370448]
|
|
Duman RS: Role of neurotrophic
factors in the etiology and treatment of mood disorders. Neuromolecular
Med 2004;5(1):11. [PMID: 15001809]
|
|
Duman RS, Monteggia LM: A
neurotrophic model for stress-related mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry
2006;59(12):1116. [PMID: 16631126]
|
|
Dvir Y, Smallwood P: Serotonin
syndrome: A complex but easily avoidable condition. Gen Hosp Psychiatry
2008;30(3):284. [PMID: 18433663]
|
|
Fiori MG: Tricyclic
antidepressants: A review of their toxicology. Curr Dev Psychopharmacol
1977;4:71. [PMID: 340145]
|
|
Fontenelle LF et al: An update
on the pharmacological treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Expert Opin Pharmacother 2007;8(5):563. [PMID: 17376013]
|
|
Gether U et al:
Neurotransmitter transporters: Molecular function of important drug
targets. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2006;27(7):375. [PMID: 16762425]
|
|
Gillespie CF, Nemeroff CB:
Hypercortisolemia and depression. Psychosom Med 2005;67(Suppl 1):S26.
|
|
Gillman PK: A review of
serotonin toxicity data: Implications for the mechanisms of
antidepressant drug action. Biol Psychiatry 2006;59(11):1046. [PMID:
16460699]
|
|
Gillman PK: Tricyclic
antidepressant pharmacology and therapeutic drug interactions updated.
Br J Pharmacol 2007;151(6):737. [PMID: 17471183]
|
|
Geddes JR et al: SSRIs versus
other antidepressants for depressive disorder. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev 2000;(2):CD001851.
|
|
Georgotas A et al: Trazodone
hydrochloride: A wide spectrum antidepressant with a unique
pharmacological profile. A review of its neurochemical effects,
pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and toxicology. Pharmacotherapy
1982;2(5):255. [PMID: 6763207]
|
|
Giner L et al: Selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the risk for suicidality in
adolescents: An update. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2005;17(3):211. [PMID:
16231472]
|
|
Glassman AH, Roose SP:
Tricyclic drugs in the treatment of depression. Med Clin North Am
1982;66(5):1037. [PMID: 6752599]
|
|
Gorman JM: Gender differences
in depression and response to psychotropic medication. Gend Med
2006;3(2):93. [PMID: 16860269]
|
|
Gupta S, Nihalani N, Masand P:
Duloxetine: Review of its pharmacology, and therapeutic use in
depression and other psychiatric disorders. Ann Clin Psychiatry
2007;19(2):125. [PMID: 17612852]
|
|
Gutman DA: Owens MJ: Serotonin
and norepinephrine transporter binding profile of SSRIs. Essent
Psychopharmacol 2006;7(1):35. [PMID: 16989291]
|
|
Halbreich U et al: Are there
differential symptom profiles that improve in response to different
pharmacological treatments of premenstrual syndrome/premenstrual
dysphoric disorder? CNS Drugs 2006;20(7):523. [PMID: 16800714]
|
|
Hansen RA et al: Efficacy and
safety of second-generation antidepressants in the treatment of major
depressive disorder. Ann Intern Med 2005;143(6):415. [PMID: 16172440]
|
|
Health, United States, 2007,
With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans, C.f.D.C.a.
Prevention. CDC National Center for Health Statistics Press:567, 2007.
|
|
Hendley ED, Snyder SH: Relationship
between the action of monoamine oxidase inhibitors on the noradrenaline
uptake system and their antidepressant efficacy. Nature
1220(5174):1330.
|
|
Heninger GR, Delgado PL,
Charney DS: The revised monoamine theory of depression: A modulatory
role for monoamines, based on new findings from monoamine depletion
experiments in humans. Pharmacopsychiatry 1996;29(1):2. [PMID: 8852528]
|
|
Hidalgo RB, Davidson JR:
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in post-traumatic stress
disorder. J Psychopharmacol 2000;14(1):70. [PMID: 10757257]
|
|
Hiemke C, Hartter S:
Pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Pharmacol
Ther 2000;85(1):11. [PMID: 10674711]
|
|
Hirschfeld RM: Antidepressants
in long-term therapy: A review of tricyclic antidepressants and
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl
2000;403:35. [PMID: 11019933]
|
|
Hirschfeld RM: History and
evolution of the monoamine hypothesis of depression. J Clin Psychiatry
2000;61(Suppl 6):4.
|
|
Holliday SM, Benfield P:
Venlafaxine. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in
depression. Drugs 1995;49(2):280. [PMID: 7729333]
|
|
Holma KM et al: Long-term
outcome of major depressive disorder in psychiatric patients is
variable. J Clin Psychiatry 2008;69(2):196. [PMID: 18251627]
|
|
Hughes CW et al: Texas
Children's Medication Algorithm Project: update from Texas Consensus
Conference Panel on Medication Treatment of Childhood Major Depressive
Disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007;46(6):667. [PMID:
17513980]
|
|
Jann MW, Slade JH:
Antidepressant agents for the treatment of chronic pain and depression.
Pharmacotherapy 2007;27(11):1571. [PMID: 17963465]
|
|
Jue SG, Dawson GW, Brogden RN:
Amoxapine: A review of its pharmacology and efficacy in depressed
states. Drugs 1982;24(1):1. [PMID: 7049659]
|
|
Kalia M: Neurobiological basis
of depression: An update. Metabolism 2005;54(5 Suppl 1):24.
|
|
Kane JM, Lieberman J: The
efficacy of amoxapine, maprotiline, and trazodone in comparison to
imipramine and amitriptyline: A review of the literature.
Psychopharmacol Bull 1984;20(2):240. [PMID: 6374720]
|
|
Katz LY et al: Effect of
regulatory warnings on antidepressant prescription rates, use of health
services and outcomes among children, adolescents and young adults.
CMAJ 2008;178(8):1005. [PMID: 18390943]
|
|
Kozisek ME, Middlemas D,
Bylund DB: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and its receptor
tropomyosin-related kinase B in the mechanism of action of
antidepressant therapies. Pharmacol Ther 2008;117(1):30. [PMID:
17949819]
|
|
Lee AL, Ogle WO, Sapolsky RM:
Stress and depression: Possible links to neuron death in the
hippocampus. Bipolar Disord 2002;4(2):117. [PMID: 12071509]
|
|
Lesch KP, Gutknecht L:
Pharmacogenetics of the serotonin transporter. Prog
Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2005;29(6):1062. [PMID: 15951088]
|
|
Lieberman DZ et al: A pooled
analysis of two placebo-controlled trials of desvenlafaxine in major
depressive disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2008;23(4):188. [PMID:
18545056]
|
|
Lin AT et al: Duloxetine
versus placebo for the treatment of women with stress predominant
urinary incontinence in Taiwan: A double-blind, randomized,
placebo-controlled trial. BMC Urol 2008;8:2. [PMID: 18221532]
|
|
Lynch ME: Antidepressants as
analgesics: A review of randomized controlled trials. J Psychiatry
Neurosci 2001;26(1):30. [PMID: 11212591]
|
|
Maletic V et al: Neurobiology
of depression: An integrated view of key findings. Int J Clin Pract
2007;61(12):2030. [PMID: 17944926]
|
|
McEwen BS: Glucocorticoids,
depression, and mood disorders: Structural remodeling in the brain.
Metabolism 2005;54(5 Suppl 1):20.
|
|
Manji HK, Drevets WC, Charney
DS: The cellular neurobiology of depression. Nat Med 2001;7(5):541.
[PMID: 11329053]
|
|
Marek GJ et al: A comparison
of trazodone and fluoxetine: implications for a serotonergic mechanism
of antidepressant action. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1992;109(1-2):2.
|
|
McCleane G: Antidepressants as
analgesics. CNS Drugs 2008;22(2):139. [PMID: 18193925]
|
|
Mendelson WB: A review of the
evidence for the efficacy and safety of trazodone in insomnia. J Clin
Psychiatry 2005;66(4):469. [PMID: 15816789]
|
|
Moller HJ: Evidence for
beneficial effects of antidepressants on suicidality in depressive
patients: A systematic review. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
2006;256(6):329. [PMID: 16783501]
|
|
Montgomery SA, Djarv L: The
antidepressant efficacy of citalopram. Int Clin Psychopharmacol
1996;11(Suppl 1):29.
|
|
Montgomery SA et al: Efficacy
and tolerability of milnacipran: An overview. Int Clin Psychopharmacol
1996;11(Suppl 4):47.
|
|
Nelson HD et al: Nonhormonal
therapies for menopausal hot flashes: Systematic review and
meta-analysis. JAMA 2006;295(17):2057. [PMID: 16670414]
|
|
Nemeroff CB: The clinical
pharmacology and use of paroxetine, a new selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitor. Pharmacotherapy 1994;14(2):127. [PMID: 8197030]
|
|
Nestler EJ et al: Neurobiology
of depression. Neuron 2002;34(1):13. [PMID: 11931738]
|
|
Nutt DJ: The neuropharmacology
of serotonin and noradrenaline in depression. Int Clin Psychopharmacol
2002;17(Suppl 1):S1.
|
|
Pace TW, Hu F, Miller AH:
Cytokine-effects on glucocorticoid receptor function: Relevance to
glucocorticoid resistance and the pathophysiology and treatment of
major depression. Brain Behav Immun 2007;21(1):9. [PMID: 17070667]
|
|
Pae CU et al: Selegiline
transdermal system: Current awareness and promise. Prog
Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1997;31(6):1153.
|
|
Patkar AA, Pae CU, Zarzar M:
Transdermal selegiline. Drugs Today (Barc) 2007;43(6):361. [PMID:
17612708]
|
|
Perugi G, Frare F, Toni C:
Diagnosis and treatment of agoraphobia with panic disorder. CNS Drugs
2007;21(9):741. [PMID: 17696574]
|
|
Physician's
Desk Reference, 62nd ed. Thomson PDR, 2008.
|
|
Plotsky PM, OwensMJ, Nemeroff
CB: Psychoneuroendocrinology of depression.
Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Psychiatr Clin North Am
1998;21(2):293. [PMID: 9670227]
|
|
Preskorn SH: Clinically
relevant pharmacology of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. An
overview with emphasis on pharmacokinetics and effects on oxidative
drug metabolism. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997;32(Suppl 1):1.
|
|
Riesenman C: Antidepressant
drug interactions and the cytochrome P450 system: A critical appraisal.
Pharmacotherapy 1995;15(6 Pt 2):84S.
|
|
Robinson DS et al: The
monoamine oxidase inhibitor, phenelzine, in the treatment of
depressive—anxiety states. A controlled clinical trial. Arch Gen
Psychiatry 1973;29(3):407. [PMID: 4579506]
|
|
Rogers SC, Clay PM: A statistical
review of controlled trials of imipramine and placebo in the treatment
of depressive illnesses. Br J Psychiatry 1975;127:599. [PMID: 1104034]
|
|
Rudolph RL, Derivan AT: The
safety and tolerability of venlafaxine hydrochloride: Analysis of the
clinical trials database. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1996;16(3 Suppl
2):54S; discussion 59S.
|
|
Rudorfer MV, Manji HK, Potter
WZ: Comparative tolerability profiles of the newer versus older
antidepressants. Drug Saf 1994;10(1):18. [PMID: 8136085]
|
|
Ruhe HG et al: Switching
antidepressants after a first selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in
major depressive disorder: A systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry
1996;67(12):1836.
|
|
Sakinofsky I: Treating
suicidality in depressive illness. Part 2: Does treatment cure or cause
suicidality? Can J Psychiatry 2007;52(6 Suppl 1):85S.
|
|
Sapolsky RM: Glucocorticoids
and hippocampal atrophy in neuropsychiatric disorders. Arch Gen
Psychiatry 2000;57(10):925. [PMID: 11015810]
|
|
Sarko J: Antidepressants, old
and new. A review of their adverse effects and toxicity in overdose.
Emerg Med Clin North Am 2000;18(4):637. [PMID: 11130931]
|
|
Schatzberg AF, Cole JO,
DeBattista C: Manual of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6th ed.
American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., 2007.
|
|
Schatzberg AF, Nemeroff C: American
Pscyhiatric Publishing Textbook of Psychopharmacology, 2nd ed.
American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., 2004.
|
|
Shapiro JR et al: Bulimia
nervosa treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Int J Eat Disord 20207;40(4):321.
|
|
Sheehan DV: The management of
panic disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63(Suppl 14):17.
|
|
Shelton RC: The role of
sertraline in the management of depression. Clin Ther 1994;16(5):768;
discussion 767.
|
|
Soomro GM et al: Selective
serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus placebo for obsessive
compulsive disorder (OCD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2008;(1):CD001765.
|
|
SSRIs: Prozac and company—part
1. Harv Ment Health Lett 2000; 17(4):1.
|
|
Stein DJ, Kupfer DJ,
Schatzberg AF: American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Mood
Disorders. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., 2006.
|
|
Stein MB, Stein DJ: Social
anxiety disorder. Lancet 2008;371(9618):1115. [PMID: 18374843]
|
|
Stokes PE: Fluoxetine: A
five-year review. Clin Ther 1993;15(2):216; discussion 215.
|
|
Stone EA, Lin Y, Quartermain
D: A final common pathway for depression? Progress toward a general
conceptual framework. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008;32(3):508. [PMID:
18023876]
|
|
Szegedi A, Schwertfeger N:
Mirtazapine: A review of its clinical efficacy and tolerability. Expert
Opin Pharmacother 6(4):631, 2005. [PMID: 15934889]
|
|
Tang SW, Helmeste D: Paroxetine.
Expert Opin Pharmacother 2008;9(5):787. [PMID: 18345955]
|
|
Tollefson GD: Monoamine
oxidase inhibitors: A review. J Clin Psychiatry 1983;44(8):280. [PMID:
6348034]
|
|
Warden D et al: The STAR*D
Project results: A comprehensive review of findings. Curr Psychiatry
Rep 2007;9(6):449. [PMID: 18221624]
|
|
Ware MR: Fluvoxamine: A review
of the controlled trials in depression. J Clin Psychiatry 1997;58(Suppl
5):15.
|
|
Wheeler BW et al: The
population impact on incidence of suicide and non-fatal self harm of
regulatory action against the use of selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitors in under 18s in the United Kingdom: Ecological study. Br Med
J 2008;336(7643):542. [PMID: 18276667]
|
|
Wright SP: Hazards with monoamine-oxidase
inhibitors: A persistent problem. Lancet 1978;1(8058):284. [PMID:
74715]
|
|
Yu S, Holsboer F, Almeida OF:
Neuronal actions of glucocorticoids: Focus on depression. J Steroid
Biochem Mol Biol 2008;108(3-5):300.
|
|
Zajecka J, Tracy KA, Mitchell
S: Discontinuation symptoms after treatment with serotonin reuptake
inhibitors: A literature review. J Clin Psychiatry 1997;58(7):291.
[PMID: 9269249]
|
|
|